The Shamrock Shake Challenge

· ·

Sam Jordan relives his harrowing attempt at completing the Shamrock Shake Challenge - drinking a gallon of the green McDonald’s milkshake in one sitting:

My goal was to gulp it all down in one long sitting. Another goal I had was to not heave green puke on my carpet. Lofty goals, sure, but remember, this is the same man who snagged 4th place on the Ms. Pac Man machine at Ernie’s Pizzeria in 1987, so…

To set the mood, I slapped on my Lucky Charms T-shirt and laid out all my Irish gear on the table. Overly sad Irish music: check. Deck of Irish writer playing cards: check. “Wu-Tang Clan Manual” by RZA: oh hells freakin check!

Read the whole article to find out if Sam was successful. Hint: A sex joke is involved


Hacking is Important

· ·

Another great article from Michael Lopp:

Hacking is disruptive, and whether you code software, write books, or film movies, I believe bringing anything new into the world is a disruptive act. By being novel and compelling, the new is likely to replace something else and that something else isn’t being replaced without a fight.


This American Life: Retraction

· ·

Earlier today, Ira Glass of This American Life announced the show was retracting its Apple episode due to lies told by Mike Daisey.

Tonight, This American Life devoted its entire show to explaining the retraction. I recommend listening (with accompanying transcript).

In a particularly gripping part of the episode, Glass confronts Daisey about his fabrication.

Ira Glass: You put us in this position of going out and vouching for the truth of what you were saying and all along, in all of these ways, you knew that these things weren’t true. Did you ever stop and think, okay these things aren’t true and you have us vouching for their truth?

Mike Daisey: I did, I did. I thought about that a lot.

Ira Glass: And just what did you think?

Mike Daisey: I felt really conflicted. I felt… trapped.

I applaud Glass for doing the right thing. However, as John Gruber notes, more companies owe the public a retraction.


Why People Use Instagram

· ·

Alicia Eler, ReadWriteWeb, on an interesting study that examined how and why people use Instagram:

From the surveys, six key trends emerged: sharing, documentation, seeing, community, creativity and therapy. People wanted more than anything to exchange images with others throughout the network, find people with whom they had common interests, document the world around them and see provide “visual status updates” to their friends. A community evolved. People were excited about the visual social interaction, and used Instagram as a creative outlet. They also found Instagram to be, in some ways, rather therapeutic.

Instagram is a staple on my iPhone home screen. It allows us to immediately see the world through others’ eyes.


Jay Yarow, Business Insider, reports that This American Life is retracting an episode that focused on working conditions at the Chinese factories used to build Apple products. It was the most popular TAL episode ever.

It turns out the person at the center of the center of the report, Mike Daisey, “partially fabricated” key details.

The episode featured Mike Daisey’s monologue, The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs. It turns out that Daisey lied about several details, including where he visited, what he witnessed, and who he actually met. The full press release can be found here.

In fairness, the monologue was originally created for theater. In that sense, creative license would indemnify Daisey. He speaks to that in his response to the retraction - presented below in its entirety:

“This American Life” has raised questions about the adaptation of AGONY/ECSTASY we created for their program. Here is my response:

I stand by my work. My show is a theatrical piece whose goal is to create a human connection between our gorgeous devices and the brutal circumstances from which they emerge. It uses a combination of fact, memoir, and dramatic license to tell its story, and I believe it does so with integrity. Certainly, the comprehensive investigations undertaken by The New York Times and a number of labor rights groups to document conditions in electronics manufacturing would seem to bear this out.

What I do is not journalism. The tools of the theater are not the same as the tools of journalism. For this reason, I regret that I allowed THIS AMERICAN LIFE to air an excerpt from my monologue. THIS AMERICAN LIFE is essentially a journalistic ­- not a theatrical ­- enterprise, and as such it operates under a different set of rules and expectations. But this is my only regret. I am proud that my work seems to have sparked a growing storm of attention and concern over the often appalling conditions under which many of the high-tech products we love so much are assembled in China.

The problem is that his statement is complete bullshit. He tries to frame his work on the episode as an adaptation - that it was created strictly as a dramatic mashup of fact and fiction. Unfortunately, his media blitz over the previous months hinged on the presumption of fact. He was interviewed by major media companies such as MSNBC, HBO, The New York Times, and more. In each case, a major component was his firsthand accounts of worker abuses. He presented those as fact, never giving any indication otherwise. To now claim that the work was merely dramatic in nature is utter nonsense.

To be clear, I am not an Apple apologist and I do not condone worker abuses. Daisey’s monologue highlights an important topic. The shame is that by falsely presenting a story as fact to shine light on real issues, Daisey ultimately acted to undermine the cause. Shame on Mike Daisey.


Mary Madden, Pew Research Center, on a report that found social media users are becoming more protective of their digital identities:

As social media use has become a mainstream activity, there has been an increasingly polarized public debate about whether or not “privacy” can be dismissed as a relic in the information age.

[…]

“Privacy” has become a powerful keyword, a shorthand tag that gets used to reference a constellation of public attitudes, technical affordances and legal arguments. Yet, the concept is so laden with multiple meanings that any use of the term begs for added specificity and context.

Some interesting findings: women are more likely than men to protect their profiles, college graduates actually report more problems with privacy controls than those with little/no college education, and men are more likely than women to regret posted content.

Also of note, at least 52% of users in each of the study’s four age groups have friends-only privacy settings. I’m willing to wager that the reasons for profile lockdown are significantly different for those aged 18-29 as compared with those aged 65+.


Michael Knorr, InfoWorld:

Microsoft cannot afford another Vista – and Windows 8 promises to be just that sort of debacle. Moreover, it seems as if internal politics may be overwhelming Microsoft’s ability to execute.

What does that say to you? To me and perhaps to many others, it says: I’m getting off this train at the next stop.

It’s starting to look like Microsoft is going to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory with Windows 8. What a shame.

Everything has pointed to the Metro UI being a game-changing paradigm shift in computing. Unfortunately, Microsoft is beholden to its former self - shoehorning potentially great stuff into legacy elements.

The problem is that Microsoft doesn’t have the balls to piss off incumbent customers in the name of progress. Looks like they still haven’t learned from Apple’s decade of dominance.


I'm Being Followed

· ·

Alexis Madrigal, The Atlantic:

Behind the details, however, are a tangle of philosophical issues that are at the heart of the struggle between privacy advocates and online advertising companies: What is anonymity? What is identity? How similar are humans and machines? This essay is an attempt to think through those questions.

A very interesting read that delves into the online advertising industry and the questions surrounding our presence. How much of our data do we control? Should we be able to control it? Does anonymity really exist? If not, should we care?

To be honest, I am unsure of my feelings about online privacy. I don’t really think there is evil at play. Advertisers are doing what they’ve always done, just online instead of print and television. Maybe it’s the nascent nature of our digital existence that leaves us uncertain. Only time will tell.


How Not To Sell Software In 2012.

·

Alex Payne offers great suggestions for how companies can make buying software easy for customers:

I want to give you my money. Your sales process may be a bigger barrier to you getting my money than your competitors. Please join us in the year 2012, where software is available instantly and transparently priced and the word “webinar” is only used ironically.


The New iPad Review Roundup.

·

As Apple prepares to launch the third-generation iPad this Friday, several sites have published their exhaustive reviews. Hint: they like it. A lot.

John Gruber, Daring Fireball:

The retina display is amazing, everything in the UI feels faster, and the price points remain the same. What’s not to love? It’s that simple.

Joshua Topolsky, The Verge:

Let’s be clear: the new iPad is in a class by itself, just as its predecessor was. As the latest product in a lineage of devices that defined this category, the iPad continues to stand head and shoulders above the competition. With the addition of the Retina display, LTE, more memory, and a more powerful CPU, Apple has absolutely held onto the iPad’s market position as the dominant player and product to beat.

Jason Snell, Macworld.com:

But the moment you pick up a third-generation iPad, you can tell the difference. All the slight jagginess and oddly misshappen characters we take for granted on lower-resolution displays just vanish on the Retina display, and you’re left with the same sort of typographic excellence you’d expect in a printed book.

M.G. Siegler, TechCrunch:

The iPad 2 is still far and away the best tablet on the market today (the iPad 3 officially comes this Friday, of course), and the new iPad screen manages to make it look like antiquated technology.

Walt Mossberg, AllThingsD:

Since it launched in 2010, the iPad has been the best tablet on the planet. With the new, third-generation model, it still holds that crown.

Jim Dalrymple, The Loop:

So, what did I like about the iPad? Simple — the experience. Nobody in the market today can touch the Apple experience.

Ed Baig, USA Today:

But the new iPad snatches the crown from its predecessor as the finest tablet you can buy. Period.

Vincent Nguyen, SlashGear:

Apple doesn’t need another revolution, it has already started one, and the new iPad brings a fresh degree of refinement to a segment in which it is undoubtedly the king.